Leaderboard

  1. GT500

    GT500

    Emsisoft Employee


    • Points

      525

    • Content Count

      9406


  2. Fabian Wosar

    Fabian Wosar

    Emsisoft Employee


    • Points

      286

    • Content Count

      4403


  3. Kevin Zoll

    Kevin Zoll

    Emsisoft Employee


    • Points

      258

    • Content Count

      18412


  4. Elise

    Elise

    Emsisoft Employee


    • Points

      239

    • Content Count

      8116



Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 01/14/12 in all areas

  1. 7 points
    Official word is, "yes". We will give free license extensions to anyone who upgraded to Windows 10 and was unable to use the firewall. Once the issue has been resolved, please either submit a support ticket in our helpdesk system, or send a Private Message on the forums to me (English Support) or Thomas Ott (English/German Sales). Be sure to mention that you would like to have your license extended due to the Windows 10 issues and include in your message any license keys that were in use on a computer with Windows 10. Feel free to link to this forum post if you would like to.
  2. 6 points
    As announced earlier, we are changing our firewall strategy and will soon merge Emsisoft Internet Security with Emsisoft Anti-Malware, effective as of our next release in October. Instead of developing our own firewall module, we’re going to rely on the built-in Windows Firewall core that has proven to be powerful and reliable. Its only weak point is the fact that anyone can freely change the firewall configuration. In other words, if malware manages to run on the PC with sufficient administrator permissions, it’s able to allow itself to get through the firewall. To resolve this vulnerability, we’ve developed a new Firewall Fortification feature for Emsisoft Anti-Malware’s Behavior Blocker as part of our 2017.8 release. Firewall Fortification detects and intercepts malicious actions from non-trustworthy programs in real time before they can cause any damage. Behavior Blocker alert: Firewall manipulation All 2017.8 improvements in a nutshell Emsisoft Anti-Malware New: Firewall Fortification feature that blocks illegitimate manipulations of Windows Firewall rules. Improved: Forensics logging. Fixed: Rare program freezes on opening the forensics log, confirming of surf protection notifications and during malware detection. Fixed: Computer restart instead of computer shutdown executed, when set for a silent scan. Several minor tweaks and fixes. Emsisoft Enterprise Console Improved certificate handling to avoid connectivity issues. Several minor user interface improvements. Several minor tweaks and fixes. How to obtain the new version As always, so long as you have auto-updates enabled in the software, you will receive the latest version automatically during your regularly scheduled updates, which are hourly by default. New users please download the full installer from our product pages. Note to Enterprise users: If you have chosen to receive “Delayed” updates in the Update settings for your clients, they will receive the new software version no earlier than 30 days after the regular “Stable” availability. This gives you time to perform internal compatibility tests before a new version gets rolled out to your clients automatically. Have a great, well-protected day! View the full article
  3. 4 points
    Guten Tag, Wir haben mittlerweile mehrfach etabliert, dass Emsisoft nicht das Programm Ihrer Wahl ist. Sie haben sich bereits anderweitig ein Antivirus gesucht, dass auch noch dreißig weitere Funktionalitäten mitabdeckt. Fakt ist jedoch, dass viele Leute eben auch ein Antivirenprogramm suchen, dass nicht noch fünfzig Extras mitbringt, die man nicht will oder nicht braucht. Für diese Leute gibt es eben Emsisoft Anti-Malware und die meisten unserer Kunden sind mit der Tatsache, dass es eben 'nur' ein Rundumschutz für den Rechner ist und nicht mehr, zufrieden. Für all die angesprochenen Features - Passwortgenerator, Kinderschutz, etc - gibt es bereits gute Programme, die man sich bei Bedarf installieren kann. Viele Leute haben aber entweder keine Kinder oder wollen diesen den Zugang nicht beschränken, warum sollten wir diesen Leuten einen Kinderschutz mitinstallieren. Einige haben eben auch nicht RAM oder CPU im Überfluß, für diese Leute ist es noch ärgerlichr wenn das RAM durch ein AV belegt ist, dass aufgrund von ungenutzten Features die Ressourcen auffrisst. Fazit: Es gibt viele Antivirenprogramme, die die eierlegende Vollmilchsau sein wollen und versuchen alle Programme in einem zu vereinen. Es gibt User, die diesen Ansatz nicht mögen und nur ein Antivirenprogramm wollen. Nicht mehr. Für diese Leute gibt es, zum Beispiel Emsisoft Anti-Malware. Sie gehören nicht zu dieser Gruppe und das ist ok. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Kathrin
  4. 4 points
    Which for everything related to our core technologies (engine, behavior blocker, cleaning engine) would be me. Hi, nice to meet you! Next time someone looks strange at me for talking to myself I can now point them to this post and tell them you asked me to talk to me . Your argument is that we chose Bitdefender because it is "the best". Both Kaspersky as well as Avira consistently score higher in pure on-demand tests than Bitdefender does. If you consider PUP detection ESET is a superior contender as well. We considered all of them at one point or another but they were discarded for various reasons. The article is based on the submission we got through the "Submit information about detected Malware" option in all our products, which reports back meta data (infection names, number of infected objects) about all infections found by our products.
  5. 4 points
    Actually, there is a system behind it: My workstation computers are named after noble gases, like Krypton or Helium. Computers that I only use temporarily or belong to guests are named after transition metals like Titanium. Non-computer devices like smartphones are named after non-metals like Oxygen. All systems and VMs that are used for malware testing are named after radioactive elements like Uranium. Needless to say my WLAN and local workgroup is called "Periodic Table". And yes, I spent a significant amount of time coming up with that system and I am proud of it .
  6. 3 points
    It means that the tests done by AV-C and AV-T have a clear image of how they think AV software should work. The problem arises when your product doesn't fit the mould. Then you get penalized for not doing what everyone else does, even though what everyone else does may not be in the best interest of the user, to begin with. Best example: Snooping around in your encrypted connections, which literally every AV vendor screwed up at least once in the past and probably will continue to happen, exposing users to potentially greater risks than most malware does. For starters, the test sets aren't nearly as representative anymore. When we participated in AV-T and AV-C both tested with less than 200 samples a month on average. 200 samples out of literally tens of millions. The exact selection isn't clear and not representative of what users deal with either. None of them tests with PUPs for example, even though a simple look at any tech support community will tell you, that it is probably by far the biggest problem users are dealing with. So no, neither of those test scores represents real-life performance and it becomes blatantly obvious when you go to places like Bleeping Computer, GeeksToGo, Trojaner Board, Malekal, and all those other communities where people infected by malware show up for help and look at what products these victims used at the time they became infected. Then you will notice that a lot of these products with perfect scores don't look nearly as perfect in real-life conditions. The reason for this discrepancy is quite simple: Most AV vendors will specifically optimise their products for these tests. The most severe cases are where vendors end up outright cheating and detecting the test environments which then results in a change of behaviour of the product (think Dieselgate, but with anti-virus). But there are many ways you can game these tests. For example: you can try to figure out the threat intel feeds the companies use, then just buy those same threat intel feeds so you have all samples in advance you can track their licenses and supply different signatures to them or use your cloud to treat those test systems differently some particularly shady organisations literally also sell you their sample and malicious URL feed, so you can just outright buy the samples and URLs your product will get tested on later What you end up with as a result is a product that is optimised really really well for the exact scenario they are being tested under using the exact type of URLs and samples these testers use, but that is utterly useless when it comes to anything else. We just really don't want to create this type of product. So when we were asked whether we wanted to continue to participate this year, we discussed the matter internally, looked at what we get out of these tests (meaning: whether these tests have a discernable impact on our revenue) and decided that they are simply not worth it and that the tens of thousands of Euros we spent on them every year would be better spent on extending our team and building new ways of keeping our customers safe.
  7. 3 points
    Please note that Emsisoft Anti-Malware for Windows XP hasn't been updated (as in program updates) in over 2 years, and we never intended on continuing long-term database update support for it. In fact, we discontinued our own database updates for it over a year and a half ago, and those still running Emsisoft Anti-Malware on Windows XP have only been receiving BitDefender database updates. We've decided that it is time to stop redistributing those BitDefender updates for Windows XP, as all they are doing is giving those on Windows XP a false sense of security. In addition, it is extremely dangerous to continue using Windows XP. It has (for several years now) had well-known and major security vulnerabilities that Microsoft will never fix. These vulnerabilities make it trivial to infect a Windows XP system, and there is no security software in the world that is capable of preventing it. We can not, in good conscience, continue to provide any support for this version of Windows, as we announced on December 31st, 2015: https://blog.emsisoft.com/2015/12/02/why-we-believe-its-not-ethical-to-sell-antivirus-software-for-windows-xp-any-longer/ We highly recommend that you upgrade to a newer Operating System that is still supported. It doesn't matter if that's a newer version of Windows, or something free like Linux or BSD, as long as you'll be receiving security updates from whoever makes it. New vulnerabilities are discovered almost every day for every major Operating System (Windows, Linux, BSD, MacOS, Android, etc) so it is absolutely critical that you are able to receive security updates from whoever made the Operating System to help keep you and your data safe.
  8. 3 points
    Wenn alle Features eingebaut würden, die Galaxy wünscht, dann würde ich EAM sofort deinstallieren. Ich mag das Programm so wie es ist und hoffe, das bleibt auch so.
  9. 3 points
    Is this working OK now for everyone else? If it is, then there's no need for any more logs. All we needed was a traceroute to send to our CDN provider to help in identifying the server that was having the issue, and I managed to get one of those the other day.
  10. 3 points
    @achtsam Es wird eher langsam Zeit, dass Du deinen privaten Kreuzzug einstellst. Das nimmt ja wirklich paranoide Züge an.
  11. 3 points
    Hello, a2guard.exe is the visible protection process (to put it simple, the Emsisoft icon you see in the system tray). However actual protection drivers start a lot earlier. For example epp.sys (the Emsisoft Protection Platform driver) starts very early in the Windows boot process in order to ensure a protected system even when no user is logged in yet and no other programs have been started.
  12. 3 points
    For the following ransomware, we have decrypters: Actively spreading ransomware: MRCR or Merry X-Mas Globe Globe 2 Globe 3 Nemucod Philadelphia Stampado Xorist Actively spreading ransomware, but the decrypter only works for older infections: Al-Namrood NMoreira LeChiffre PClock FenixLocker GlobeImposter Inactive ransomware: 777 Apocalypse ApocalypseVM AutoLocky BadBlock CrypBoss CryptInfinite CryptoDefense DMALocker DMALocker2 Fabiansomware Harasom HydraCrypt Gomasom KeyBTC Marlboro OpenToYou OzozaLocker Radamant
  13. 3 points
    Today, we've received information that our Dutch team member Rob R. passed away yesterday afternoon, after suffering from an unexpected heart attack last Wednesday. Rob was our lead software tester and we always admired him for his special eye to track down the most tricky bugs. He joined our team more than five years ago by voluntarily sending over a brand new and complete Dutch translation of our software. Shortly after he initiated our efforts in offering physical delivery of our software on CD boxes and USB sticks. He also demonstrated a great interest in testing security software which recently led him to becoming our lead tester for Emsisoft Anti-Malware and Emsisoft Internet Security. Rob will truly live on in our memories as a valued team member and friend.
  14. 3 points
    Hardik587 You are indeed becoming most wearisome. There is an old expression among diehard Texans. "No matter how much you kick a dead horse it won't get up" This is exactly what you are doing.
  15. 3 points
    Hello, please send me your license key via PM (personal message). I will add some days to your key as a sign of goodwill.
  16. 2 points
    I've been told that the time window for being able to figure out keys for .kiratos has ended, however I will go ahead and pass this on to the developer of STOPDecrypter so that he can archive it just in case he's able to figure out the decryption key at some point in the future.
  17. 2 points
    Hi Marshall. Not sure, but I do know that I recognize the URL of "MVPS Hosts" and I recognize the list. I don't recognize the list attached to MVPS Hosts (Domains). To view the list, click the blue "Details", "View" & "Original" buttons - see image. Sorry I couldn't offer a better explanation.
  18. 2 points
    Personally I think following the tests is a waste of time. If you are really concerned then you will need to make the effort to do your own testing. that is what I did. Also the tests don't tell you a thing about the nature of the company. I will stick with Emsisoft because I think it's the best
  19. 2 points
    FYI: https://blog.emsisoft.com/en/32110/emsisoft-anti-malware-2018-9-beta/
  20. 2 points
    https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/google/google-will-block-third-party-software-from-injecting-code-into-chrome/ Our Surf Protection works by filtering DNS requests made by running applications. Since EAM doesn't use network filter drivers, it has to achieve this using code injection. Now that Chromium is blocking code injection by third-party applications, our Surf Protection will not work with it until we are able to make some changes. My recommendation is to install uBlock Origin and uBlock Origin Extra (both work in Google Chrome and Vivaldi) to supplement until we can get our Surf Protection working in Chrome again. uBlock Origin is a free content blocker that not only blocks ads, but also used the extensive blacklists of malicious domains available from Malware Domain List and Malware Domains to block malicious content. Note: Vivaldi 1.15 (the current stable version) is based on Chromium 65 with backported security fixes from Chromium 66, 67, and 68. Vivaldi 2.0 is based on Chromium 69, and is currently available in testing builds. Anyone with the stable version of Vivaldi installed will not be effected by this issue. Anyone using a Vivaldi 2.0 snapshot will also experience this issue with Surf Protection. Also note: Due to the added protection of an ad blocker, we recommend uBlock Origin (with uBlock Origin Extra for Chromium based browsers like Google Chrome, Vivaldi, and Opera) regardless of whether or not our Surf Protection is working with your web browser. Anti-Virus/Anti-Malware does not block ads by default (doing so can break some websites), and the companies that sell online advertising do not do a good enough job of preventing their ads from being abused by their clients, and there have been many cases of serious threats in advertisements even on legitimate websites. Please be aware that there is another content blocker called "uBlock". This is not the same thing as uBlock Origin, and is not recommended. The main reason for recommending uBlock Origin is due to its performance and memory usage being better than popular ad blockers (AdBlock, Adblock Plus, AdGuard, etc). If you wish to use one of those instead, then please feel free to do so, however I do not know if they are configured to use Malware Domain List and Malware Domains by default and recommend checking their configuration to ensure they are offering the same level of protection as uBlock Origin. If they are not configured to use these lists of malicious websites, then you should be able to add them through FilterLists.com. Note that this site was down at the time I posted this, so I was not able to check and verify that, however this site lists almost every popular filter list for ad and content blockers and it should include important blacklists like these.
  21. 2 points
    Are there any plans of introducing an anti-malware for Mac in the near future? I'm very curious. We see more and more interest of our customers that are demanding a good mac protection software. Now we deliver Emsisoft for Windows but we can't for MAC OS. By canceling development of EIS is there now more of a possibility for a new product?
  22. 2 points
    I could only confirm David's post - on both my computers with Comodo (Win 7 64 bit, SSD HDD - as this probably had some impact on that unpleasant EAM behaviour) I switched to stable version and all seem to work. So yes, the problem with Comodo on some comps is probably over. I want to add my two cents to discusion above. I work with computer more than 25 years. A lot years ago I worked as programmer. This is all over now (even as I sometimes write a few lines of code in php and MySQL). My main work is with graphics software, but for a few of my customers I do also some kind of computer servis. Not that I'm any expert in LAN's or such but I could help individual users with some computer problems. So my computer knowledges are a little bit above standard. Usually I could help myself with any and all hardware or software troubles, but this time it was very frustrating and it took me a lot of precious time (which I should have spent differently) to revert my work and home computers back to working state. And it was because of EAM "no user asking" PROGRAM update (unfortunately it even didn't create system restore point - why this isn't standard upon bigger program update is above my understanding). This is why I ask you for avoiding such program behaviour. I understand your points but you should hear our opinions also. Maybe it's not wise to let some users decide about something they don't understand but I don't ask you to do this. You can let default EAM settings on stable version update but I'd appreciate the possibility for some of us to switch off this behaviour. Why couldn't you add to setup/actualization menu two choices: 1) update program without asking user 2) update program only after user confirmation? First choice could be the default one - I don't care. This would be enough. And (not only) after this experience I'd immediately switch it to the "update program only after user confirmation". And a few words to Neneduty post: no, I won't uninstall ANY of my programs only because ANY antivirus software couldn't work with it. All programs are in my computers for good reasons (this is true especially for Comodo firewall). This could end that Emsisoft (or any other antivirus producer for that reason) could ask me not to use my graphics programs, because they could be in conflict with EAM (btw. there was situation Adobe Acrobat didn't start because of conflict with EAM one time - I resolved it with Emsisoft help then - fortunately Emsisoft helpdesk didn't want me to uninstall it :-) ). Antivirus software is in any computer to help not to be infected by computer virus; it's not there to block users to work with their programs... Any other debate about this is ridiculous. Uffff. Enough from me.
  23. 2 points
    It is not the UI doing the protection, it is the service/driver, and they are the first things to be loaded during boot even before your desktop appears.
  24. 2 points
    Emsisoft Anti-Malware ist vollständig mit dem Windows Update kompatibel. Wir haben ausserdem grade ein Update für alle Nutzer des Beta, Stable und Delayed Update Trees veröffentlicht, dass den entsprechenden Kompatibilitätsmarker in der Registry platziert. Wir möchten an dieser Stelle zu bedenken geben, dass Microsoft den selben Kompatibilitätsmarker für alle Anti-Virus und Anti-Malware Anwendungen verwendet. Sollten also mehr als ein Anti-Virus oder Anti-Malware Programm in Benutzung sein, besteht das Risiko das eine der Anwendungen, wie Emsisoft Anti-Malware z.B., das System als kompatibel markiert, obwohl eines der anderen installierten Sicherheitsprodukte nicht kompatibel ist. Es gibt für uns leider keine Möglichkeit dies zu verhindern oder abzufangen, da Microsoft die Verwendung mehrerer Schutzprogramme auf dem selben System schlicht nicht vorsieht. Dies ist übrigens ein perfektes Beispiel dafür, wieso wir seit Windows 10 von der parallelen Verwendung mehrerer Sicherheitsprogramme abraten. Weitere Informationen, gibt es auch in unserem Blog.
  25. 2 points
    Emsisoft Anti-Malware is compatible with the Windows update. We also just published an update that sets the compatibility flag for all users of the beta, stable and delayed update feed. Keep in mind, that Microsoft uses the same flag for all anti-virus vendors. That means if you are using multiple anti-viruses or anti-malware applications, you are risking one of those products, like Emsisoft Anti-Malware, flagging the system as compatible, even though one of your other products is not compatible. There is, unfortunately, nothing we can do to prevent this as Microsoft does not account for the scenario of multiple security products being installed on the same system. This is the perfect example why we are recommending against using multiple security products in parallel. For further information, feel free to stop by our blog.
  26. 2 points
    The holiday season is not only a great opportunity to spend time with loved ones, but also to look back at the year gone by. For us at Emsisoft, we could finally take a brief moment to realize just how busy 2017 has been for the team and the wider security industry: from major ransomware outbreaks that took most (Emsisoft customers excluded) by surprise to constant product evolution to guarantee the best possible malware protection for our customers, this year has been anything but uneventful. Better surf protection: Both online and in the water Prevention is worth a pound of cure, so raising awareness of online security issues has always been close to our hearts. Back in November 2016 we started out with the world’s first surf protection research using drones and high technology drifters, teaming up with Surf Life Saving New Zealand to map currents and further understand threats and dangers that await unsuspecting surfers under the surface. The campaign results exceeded our highest expectations: not only was the project widely covered in media outlets across the country, but the insight gained formed the basis for future projects and was even presented at a conference sponsored by the World Health Organization. As our CEO Christian Mairoll put it: Whether online or in the water, Emsisoft always aims to observe dangerous environments, analyze specific threats and most importantly prevent dangerous situations that surfers suffer from everyday. Ransomware outbreaks take many by surprise Ransomware attacks are nothing new for our team, but the sheer size and speed of two major outbreaks this year caught many off guard. In May, Wannacry ransomware took advantage of the NSA shadow broker exploits to rapidly spread to hundreds of thousands of machines, including major corporations in Europe and beyond. A mere month later, Petya used the same exploits to wreak havoc across high-profile businesses in dozens of countries and exposed, despite repeated warnings from security experts, the general lack of basic protective measures, including up-to-date operating systems, regular backups and the use of reputable anti-malware software. Our customers were safe from these attacks thanks to Emsisoft Anti-Malware’s multi-layered protection. Yet it’s events like these that remind us of the need to constantly improve our technology and awareness to stay one step ahead of cybercriminals. Emsisoft evolves to stay ahead of malware Malware attacks of this nature require an immediate response. Luckily, one of our main advantages over many competitors is our ability to adapt quickly. Starting in January, we introduced a new product versioning scheme that aligns with our development month and laid the foundation to bring protection and usability features to our customers faster than ever, rather than waiting for a major release. Making great protection even better Our customers choose Emsisoft first and foremost for one reason: to be protected from all types of malware threats. It’s a job we take seriously, which is why we have launched a number of improvements throughout 2017. Our personal highlights: We made our Behavior Blocker even more capable, detecting malware and ransomware threats that try to disable antivirus software. We promoted our existing ransomware protection into a dedicated “Anti-Ransomware” layer. We added Double Pulsar exploit mitigation in response to the increase in ransomware outbreaks. This doesn’t include the countless under-the-hood changes to the Surf Guard to detect even more phishing scams and the performance improvements we have launched month after month to ensure your protection does not get in the way of your day. Keeping things simple Simplicity is one of our core values here at Emsisoft, and the product team made it a clear focus to deliver against it in 2017. We looked at all aspects of our software and listened to a lot of customer feedback to learn how we can make things better, faster, and simpler. The result was a raft of new and improved features that we released over the last 12 months, including: a simplified user permissions system based on 2 groups; a brand-new feature to exclude specific programs from scanning and protection; an extended Forensic Log to better reproduce malware-related events on your machine; an auto-resolve mode for the behavior blocker to reduce user-dependencies; email notifications. Merging Emsisoft Internet Security with Emsisoft Anti-Malware But perhaps the biggest change in terms of our product development has been the merging of Emsisoft Internet Security with Emsisoft Anti-Malware in October this year. What may have seemed like a sudden decision was the result of a careful evaluation of our core competencies, the realities of a changing malware landscape and the preparation for things to come. To ensure customers dependent on a firewall would receive a comparable level of protection, we released a Fortification feature for the Windows Firewall to ensure that malware will not be able to tamper with it. Business-grade security that just works As we’ve touched on earlier, this year in particular exposed just how devastating ransomware attacks can be for companies both large and small if they do not have reliable endpoint protection in place. We always believed that sophisticated, enterprise-level endpoint protection does not need to be complex, and we have continued to refine the experience of our business customers, whether that’s enhanced Emsisoft Enterprise Console connection features or new MSI setup files for time-efficient group policy deployment in larger Windows networks. Our efforts did not go unnoticed either, as independent test lab AV-Comparatives praised our business solution for its ease of use, clean design and fast deployment capabilities in this year’s Business Security Report 2017. Combined with a stellar malware protection rate powered by Emsisoft Anti-Malware, we walked away with the “Approved Business Product Award” for the second year running. The feedback that counts: yours While it’s great to get recognized with industry awards for our malware protection performance, it’s the messages we receive from our customers and partners that put a smile on our faces and give us the motivation to get up in the morning to fight the good fight. I wanted to take a moment of your time and let you know that there just isn’t a better anti-malware company than Emsisoft. Your dedication to the world of online protection is the best in the business. I have 100% confidence in Emsisoft to keep me safe on line no matter what. It’s just something I never have to think about. Joel Gardner, Switzerland Emsisoft is about security. Looks good, works good, is light and what is most important, Emsisoft is about trust. My is over 8 years as paid customer, without any single security PC problem. Franky via Twitter Another gold star for Emsisoft! I’ve been with you since a-squared, and it’s always been prompt, professional and excellent service all the way, not to mention the superb software solutions. These days, companies that care are unfortunately few and far between. Douglas Sharp, Germany I own a brick and mortar retail computer repair shop. We have sold hundreds if not thousands of copies of Emsisoft through our retail business. I have to say Emsisoft works so well that I feel like it may be hurting our repair business. Our customers like it and that’s what matters. David Gentry, Lantean Systems LLC, USA What lies ahead in 2018? Ransomware once again dominated the year, and we are expecting this trend to continue into 2018. Wannacry and Petya attacks made sure that even the most technophobic among us have at least a basic level of awareness. But they also laid bare the ample opportunities for cyber crime as too many business still don’t have credible security strategies in place. We covered the emergence and increasing sophistication of Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) business models, allowing anyone with malicious intentions to execute their own ransomware attack and share the ill-gotten gains with the RaaS creators. Given the ease of using these services and the proliferation of cryptocurrencies, we at Emsisoft expect the ransomware campaigns to continue unabated into the new year. The other trend to keep an eye on is also connected to the rise of digital currencies: Cryptomining. Online criminals and even some „legitimate“ websites are experimenting with the use of crypto-miners to extract revenue from users. Whether it will evolve into a legitimate alternative to the established ad model or remain mostly a tactic by malware authors remains to be seen. Whatever the outcome, as long as cryptocurrencies continue to rise, we expect to come across increasingly sophisticated variants. But what will Emsisoft look like in 2018? We plan to continue our efforts to declutter Emsisoft Anti-Malware to make it the easiest to use protection software on the market. Our Malware Lab is working relentlessly on a new malware detection and protection system that is going to raise the bar in the industry. In addition, our product development teams have started working on a major project a couple of months ago that is expected to be launched no earlier than mid 2018. We can’t wait to share more details as we get closer to the actual release and to hear what you think. But until then, you can count on Emsisoft to protect you from all the current and future threats that may lurk out there. Malware never sleeps, and nor do we. Have a brilliant, malware-free 2018! View the full article
  27. 2 points
    Ah, I see everyone already saw the stable build. You're welcome.
  28. 2 points
    Hi LandLord323, Unfortunately, we can't decrypt your files for free. I suggest either making sure you change the RDP password to be more secure or disabling it if you do not use it as that is how they get access. Regards, Sarah
  29. 2 points
    Vielen Dank für die Antwort. Ein Lösegeld ist geflossen, aber die Entschlüsselung funktioniert nicht sauber. Am Ende der meisten Dateien bleiben Codereste übrig, die natürlich die Funktion des Systemes stark einschränken und die ganze Aktion ist für die Katz. Ich kann die Dateien teilweise per Hand bereinigen, aber das ist keine Lösung. Sollte eine saubere Entschlüsselung möglich sein, wäre ich sehr dankbar, da sonst alle Patientendaten einfach mal weg sind. Das wäre ein Totalschaden. Im Moment setze ich das System neu auf und versuche die Oracledatenbank wiederherzustellen und brauchbar zu machen. Wenn es von Interesse ist, kann ich die Entschlüsselungsdatei zur Verfügung stellen. Aber bei diesem Trojaner ist eine Zahlung sinnlos.
  30. 2 points
    Das Problem ist, dass keine Schutzsoftware Dir helfen kann. Wenn der Server aufgemacht wird, was bei TeamXRat, die Malware die dahinter steckt, der Fall ist, kann der Angreifer die Software einfach beenden oder die Malware erlauben. Ich hab die Malware kurz ueberflogen und sie sieht entschluesselbar aus. Falls das Loesegeld also noch nicht bezahlt wurde, dann kann ich mal schauen was ich tun kann.
  31. 2 points
    Hi CBMan, Thank you for your suggestion. As the idea seems fair to me, I added your suggestion in our tracker. Will be discussed soon and then we will decide if discard or work on it. Thanks again, Orlando
  32. 2 points
    The following innovations make Online Armor 5.5 our best firewall ever: Integration of Anti-Malware Network: Unknown programs are immediately cross-checked against the cloud. The Online Database contains around 4 million entries and relies on the intelligence of the cloud. Programs considered harmless are automatically permitted, while annoying pop-up windows and alerts are omitted. So you can totally focus on your work! New cloud-based scan: Our cloud scan, already used in Emsisoft MalAware, has been included in Online Armor. Even if there is no record of a file in the Anti-Malware Network, more than 7 million signatures mean that malware can be recognized reliably to keep your PC safe. Improved license and update system: Software updates are downloaded and installed way quicker. Moreover, Online Armor relies on the license system used for other Emsisoft products. Access our Customer Center to find and manage the licenses for all your Emsisoft products in one place. Your Online Armor license key will be automatically transferred to the new system as soon as you use version 5.5 for the first time. Unnecessary key resets when reinstalling your OS are a thing of the past. New pricing system rewards your loyalty: The 1-year license is 25 % cheaper if renewed once the initial 1-year period has expired and will be a further 5 % cheaper for every additional year you renew it. Long-term customers can thus benefit from discounts of up to 50 %. Fine tuning: We have added news popups that keep you up to date with the latest Emsisoft news and fixed several potential incompatibilites, e.g. in combination with Ad Muncher or WinCrypt. As well as countless minor changes for improved user experience and best protection. To get the latest version, just run an online update or alternatively uninstall and reinstall the latest setup package from the official Emsisoft Online Armor product page. If you are using Online Armor FREE earlier than 5.0, please uninstall this version and download the new one. Introductory offer: Pack of 3 for the price of 1 = 45 % discount! Limited offer until February 14th, 2012: Buy a 1-year license now for Emsisoft Online Armor Firewall for 3 PCs at a special price: Instead of US $73.- only US $40.-. Buy here
  33. 2 points
    Ich kann diesen beinahe hysterischen Umgang mit dem Virenschutz ohnehin nicht nachvollziehen. Ich vertraue Emsisoft, weil es im Unterschied zu sehr vielen anderen nicht spioniert und keinen Crap mitinstalliert bzw. anbietet. Das ist fast ein - und mir persönlich sehr wichtiges - Alleinstellungsmerkmal. Außerdem arbeiten an der Software Menschen, da kann es durchaus vorkommen, daß jemand temporär mal ein Brett vorm Kopf hat, es urlaubsbedingt oder aus anderen Gründen (Todesfall) zu personeller Unterbesetzung kommt oder man kurz hinter einer Erkennungsrate herhinkt, weil da jemand bei XXX einen Geistesblitz hatte oder besonders empathisch war. In solchen Fällen wird dann schnellstmöglich "aufgeholt". Folglich kein Problem und bei jedem Hersteller so vorkommend. Außerdem soll und kann jeder Schutz ja auch nur "Spitzen kappen". In erster Linie ist bei jeder Maschine derjenige gefragt, der davor sitzt, also brain.exe. In Grunde hat dieses permanente Vergleichen der Tests mit etwas Abstand betrachtet so'n Beigeschmack von Pimmellängevergleichen - oder auch dieser Anspruch, daß Deutschland gefälligst die Goldmedaillen holen muß, das ist eine verzerrte Sicht aus der gleichen Ecke. Gelassenheit und ehrliche Fairness, daran mangelt's immer häufiger. Und das obwohl das ständige "cool" doch in aller Munde ist...
  34. 2 points
    Thanks, works great, thanks for all the feedback in this thread and for getting it sorted.
  35. 2 points
    Perhaps add to EAM an option to disable this feature? Not all of us are gamers ..............................
  36. 2 points
    hi, as you know Online Armor and the latest Emsisoft Internet security v9 can't be installed when Virtual box is present (it will generates a BSOD) ; so there is the procedure to to have them both. If Virtual Box is not installed yet (and was never installed) 1- Install OA/ EIS 2- install Vbox If Virtual Box was installed before but removed 2- open "Regedit" (via Run) 3- check this registry key : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VBoxNetFlt 4- if it's still present, delete it 5- reboot (not necessary, but better if done) 6- install OA/EIS 7- install Vbox If Virtual Box is already installed 1- uninstall Vbox 2- open "Regedit" (via Run) 3- check this registry key : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VBoxNetFlt 4- if it's still present, delete it 5- reboot (not necessary, but better if done) 6- install OA/EIS 7- install Vbox hope this will help you note: i did this procedure since ages so it really works ^^
  37. 2 points
    just click the 'more reply options' button and attach any file to your post.
  38. 2 points
    Generell basiert der Mechanismus des Quarantaene Rescans darauf, dass wir Elemente in der Quarantaene nach jedem Update neu scannen. Sollte eine Datei dann ploetzlich nicht laenger erkannt sein, gehen wir davon aus, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelte. Wir justieren Erkennungen konstant. Entsprechend kann es vorkommen, dass insbesondere bei Erkennungen, die von generischen Signaturen ausgeloest wurden, selbst kleine Modifikationen dazu fuehren, dass ein bestimmtes Sample einer Malware Familie nicht laenger erkannt wird. Falls man generell nicht moechte, dass EAM oder EIS die Quarantaene bei jedem Update neu scanned, dann kann man unter Einstellungen/Allgemein den Quarantaene-Scan von "Automatisch" auf "Kein erneutes Scannen" aendern. Haette sie definitiv. Tesla ist im Grunde nicht wirklich neu. Die ersten Versionen gehen auf Mai diesen Jahres zurueck. Das hier wuerde passieren, wenn man versucht TeslaCrypt auf einem von EAM or EIS geschuetzten PC auszufuehren: Sollte man die Cloud Unterstuetzung deaktiviert haben oder in dem unwahrscheinlichen Falle, dass die Cloud das Sample noch nicht kennt, dann bekommt man folgende Warnungen zu sehen: Erst nachdem man jede dieser Warnhinweise ignoriert und die weitere Ausfuehrung erlaubt hat, wird ueberhaupt irgendeine Datei auf dem PC verschluesselt.
  39. 2 points
    I would only recommend one Sandboxing program, Sandboxie. I have used it for years, and it works fine with Emsisoft products. When you install it, Sandboxie will detect the presence of Emsisoft products and ask you if you want to enable compatibility settings. You would want to do this. Any questions, feel free to ask. Pete
  40. 2 points
    I know, that is why I only counted signature updates. Whenever you see an exact signature count in the change log above, one of our signatures was updated. Sorry, what you ask is impossible. It should be obvious to anyone, that if you have a scan engine that already detects 95% of all malware out there, that the other engine can't suddenly detect more than that without causing gross redundancy. In general we can choose to waste hundreds of megabytes of RAM on hundreds of thousands of systems to keep duplicate signatures around so you feel validated in your purchase, or we can choose not to do that, not to waste everyone's resources. To be honest, that's not even a choice really.
  41. 2 points
    Dear nine9s, Thank you for contacting our support. If you change hardware when your license key is still active our system will make no troubles if you simply install Emsisoft Anti-Malware on the new computer and activate it with your existing license key. If the old system should still be in use at this point you would need to remove Emsisoft Anti-Malware from the old computer before you use your existing license key to unlock the full version on the new system, otherwise no additional actions would be necessary. Thank you for using our software solutions! Should you have any further questions, please just let us know.
  42. 2 points
    I appreciate the honesty but I hope you understand that a bug like this needs to be fixed on top priority. It prevents the download of critical updates unless the Firewall is deactivated but deactivating the firewall can make the system vulnerable. I mean an issue as critical as this should be treated as soon as possible.
  43. 2 points
    Good morning. Can we expect to get a fix for the updates not working soon, please? Having to disable the firewall to get updates seems an important bug to me. Thanks in advance and best regards, François
  44. 2 points
    I don't have any insight in the test-methodology apart from what the article states, but a few observations make me doubt the relevancy of this test: The test compares a number of different products: antirootkit scanners and anti-malware scanners. This makes no sense to me. TDSSkiller is an excellent Antirootkit scanner in my opinion, but it is a limited tool, you cannot compare this with a anti-malware scanner like EEK or MBAM because its simply a different product. The tested malware is for the most part very, very old and not seen in the wild anymore, even though the article states 2015 and "in the wild" in the title. To give a few examples: Alureon/TDL3/4 hasn't been around "in the wild" for at least 3 years (and thats estimating it very loosely) The article listed is from 2010 (!) http://contagiodump.blogspot.gr/2011/02/tdss-tdl-4-alureon-32-bit-and-64-bit.html?m=1 The same goes for ZeroAccess/Max++. The latest usermode version of that rootkit was active in 2013 and after the botnet was taken down for a large part, there has been no re-emergence of this malware. However, its kernelmode version was quite a bit older, this was last seen in 2011. Sure, its interesting to see how products perform against such rootkits, but how useful is it? Those rootkits were "retired" for a very good reason, they can no longer infected today's OS versions. Finally, I'm not one to make accusations, but I don't like "sponsored by..." tests. I'm fully willing to believe that Zemana was indeed the best product to remove all these infections, but I just think its not the best strategy for any testing lab to let a sponsor also participate in the tests, just to avoid any possible doubt as to the objectiveness of the test results.
  45. 2 points
    At the moment it is not possible to delete multiple lines at once. I have made a suggestion internally to add it though.
  46. 2 points
    Dies ist die Kernaussage des m.M.n exzellenten Artikels auf der offiz. HP: http://blog.emsisoft.com/de/2015/06/26/antivirensoftware-schutz-fuer-ihre-dateien-aber-auf-kosten-ihrer-privatsphaere/ Ich finde, dieser wichtige Aspekt wird viel zu wenig gewürdigt, sei es in den Tests der ganzen Testinstitute, die meist nur nach Erkennung, Beseitigung und Performance unterteilen oder in den ganzen "Fach"zeitschriften wie computerbild oder chip, etc. Aber auch bei den Usern: Wenn ich mir anschaue, dass auf dem beliebtesten Donwload-Portal Deutschlands Avira über 400.000 Mal diesen Monat heruntergeladen wurde, dann muss man sich fragen, ob es den meisten Usern nicht schlichtweg egal ist, was mit Ihren Daten passiert oder sie wissen es erst gar nicht: Motto, Hauptsache, es ist umsonst. Erschwerend dazu kommt der Herdentrieb: Soviele User können sich ja gar nicht irren. Umsonst soll ja heute sowieso alles am besten sein; wer bezahlt die Malware-Analysten, die Developer, die an den Erkennungsroutinen und am Selbstschutz des Programms arbeiten, die normale Verwaltung und die angebundene Hardware/Server u.v.m? Das alles wird ausgeblendet. Wirklich umsonst ist heute fast nichts mehr, sei es Avast (in o.a. Artikel ja erwähnt), AVG (Toolbar) oder Avira - lange Jahre Ask-Toolbar in Verwendung, heute angeblich eine eigenständig entwickelte ("Hust"!). Hier bezahlt man m.M.n indirekt mit den persönlichen Daten. Ich finde, jede Software ist heute immer Vertrauenssache, das trifft vor allem auf AV Programme zu. In dem Kontext finde ich Emsisoft und seine Datenschutzpolitik klasse , neben der sehr guten Erkennung war das für mich das Hauptkriterium bei der Kaufentscheidung! Weiter so Emsisoft!
  47. 2 points
    Supi, AdwCleaner bitte öffnen und Deinstallieren drücken. FRST samt Logfiles, sowie den Ordner C:\FRST, einfach löschen.
  48. 2 points
    Hi Legend, You bring up a good question, but unfortunately there isn't one answer here. That is because a lot of definitions are being used for the same term. See for example also Fabian's explanation here. For Emsisoft you can just say its about the same thing, just a different term. Behavior blocking or IDS both can have user interaction, its the fact that the program is able to recognize a certain intrusion or behavior that counts, after that its the user or program settings that decide what is actually done with it. The issue is, IDS implies already something malicious is going on. That is sometimes misleading, because not each alert is generated by malware. Behavior blocking covers it better IMO, because it suggests it is behavior that causes an alert, which doesn't necessarily mean this behavior is also malicious (and here community based input plays a role, in Emsisoft products you usually will see that plain malware will be auto-blocked by community input (90% of the users blocked it, so EAM will block it) while questionable or even legitimate programs will respectively prompt for action or be automatically allowed. That system isn't 100% fail safe, but will help quite a bit reducing alerts. Advanced heuristics is really a very general term as well. In most cases (as explained also in the post I linked you to above) it implies some sort of emulation is going on. That sounds quite good, but malware can also protect itself against this type o emulation (and refuse to be executed when it detects emulation for example). Yes, EAM does not use emulation. Again, this is really a generalization, each security program may have their own definitions of these terms and/or use this in their own way. EAM's behavior blocker works quite well as you can also see by observing for example AVC's real world protection tests. In EAM9 some additional functionality has been added (static is nice, but that doesn't mean we're not continuously working to find new ways to block malware as early as possible ). I hope this answers your questions (and didn't cause more confusion).
  49. 2 points
    The value listed in msconfig is a registry value, so if you feel comfortable editing the Windows registry then yes you can change it. The entry you are seeing is for the Guard (the part of Emsisoft Anti-Malware that draws the System Tray icon and handles displaying notifications). It needs to wait for the service the be running before it tries to start, and since the server takes longer to load than it does it is best to have a small delay to prevent issues.
  50. 2 points
    In general the behavior blocker ignores most scripting hosts, as it is not possible to distinguish which actions are triggered by the script and which are triggered by the scripting host. The File Guard however does trigger when trying to execute the scripts you uploaded.
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?

    Sign Up