Leaderboard

  1. GT500

    GT500

    Emsisoft Employee


    • Points

      552

    • Content Count

      9609


  2. Fabian Wosar

    Fabian Wosar

    Emsisoft Employee


    • Points

      298

    • Content Count

      4403


  3. Kevin Zoll

    Kevin Zoll

    Emsisoft Employee


    • Points

      268

    • Content Count

      18423


  4. Elise

    Elise

    Emsisoft Employee


    • Points

      240

    • Content Count

      8124



Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 10/13/09 in Posts

  1. 7 points
    Official word is, "yes". We will give free license extensions to anyone who upgraded to Windows 10 and was unable to use the firewall. Once the issue has been resolved, please either submit a support ticket in our helpdesk system, or send a Private Message on the forums to me (English Support) or Thomas Ott (English/German Sales). Be sure to mention that you would like to have your license extended due to the Windows 10 issues and include in your message any license keys that were in use on a computer with Windows 10. Feel free to link to this forum post if you would like to.
  2. 6 points
    As announced earlier, we are changing our firewall strategy and will soon merge Emsisoft Internet Security with Emsisoft Anti-Malware, effective as of our next release in October. Instead of developing our own firewall module, we’re going to rely on the built-in Windows Firewall core that has proven to be powerful and reliable. Its only weak point is the fact that anyone can freely change the firewall configuration. In other words, if malware manages to run on the PC with sufficient administrator permissions, it’s able to allow itself to get through the firewall. To resolve this vulnerability, we’ve developed a new Firewall Fortification feature for Emsisoft Anti-Malware’s Behavior Blocker as part of our 2017.8 release. Firewall Fortification detects and intercepts malicious actions from non-trustworthy programs in real time before they can cause any damage. Behavior Blocker alert: Firewall manipulation All 2017.8 improvements in a nutshell Emsisoft Anti-Malware New: Firewall Fortification feature that blocks illegitimate manipulations of Windows Firewall rules. Improved: Forensics logging. Fixed: Rare program freezes on opening the forensics log, confirming of surf protection notifications and during malware detection. Fixed: Computer restart instead of computer shutdown executed, when set for a silent scan. Several minor tweaks and fixes. Emsisoft Enterprise Console Improved certificate handling to avoid connectivity issues. Several minor user interface improvements. Several minor tweaks and fixes. How to obtain the new version As always, so long as you have auto-updates enabled in the software, you will receive the latest version automatically during your regularly scheduled updates, which are hourly by default. New users please download the full installer from our product pages. Note to Enterprise users: If you have chosen to receive “Delayed” updates in the Update settings for your clients, they will receive the new software version no earlier than 30 days after the regular “Stable” availability. This gives you time to perform internal compatibility tests before a new version gets rolled out to your clients automatically. Have a great, well-protected day! View the full article
  3. 4 points
    Guten Tag, Wir haben mittlerweile mehrfach etabliert, dass Emsisoft nicht das Programm Ihrer Wahl ist. Sie haben sich bereits anderweitig ein Antivirus gesucht, dass auch noch dreißig weitere Funktionalitäten mitabdeckt. Fakt ist jedoch, dass viele Leute eben auch ein Antivirenprogramm suchen, dass nicht noch fünfzig Extras mitbringt, die man nicht will oder nicht braucht. Für diese Leute gibt es eben Emsisoft Anti-Malware und die meisten unserer Kunden sind mit der Tatsache, dass es eben 'nur' ein Rundumschutz für den Rechner ist und nicht mehr, zufrieden. Für all die angesprochenen Features - Passwortgenerator, Kinderschutz, etc - gibt es bereits gute Programme, die man sich bei Bedarf installieren kann. Viele Leute haben aber entweder keine Kinder oder wollen diesen den Zugang nicht beschränken, warum sollten wir diesen Leuten einen Kinderschutz mitinstallieren. Einige haben eben auch nicht RAM oder CPU im Überfluß, für diese Leute ist es noch ärgerlichr wenn das RAM durch ein AV belegt ist, dass aufgrund von ungenutzten Features die Ressourcen auffrisst. Fazit: Es gibt viele Antivirenprogramme, die die eierlegende Vollmilchsau sein wollen und versuchen alle Programme in einem zu vereinen. Es gibt User, die diesen Ansatz nicht mögen und nur ein Antivirenprogramm wollen. Nicht mehr. Für diese Leute gibt es, zum Beispiel Emsisoft Anti-Malware. Sie gehören nicht zu dieser Gruppe und das ist ok. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Kathrin
  4. 4 points
    Which for everything related to our core technologies (engine, behavior blocker, cleaning engine) would be me. Hi, nice to meet you! Next time someone looks strange at me for talking to myself I can now point them to this post and tell them you asked me to talk to me . Your argument is that we chose Bitdefender because it is "the best". Both Kaspersky as well as Avira consistently score higher in pure on-demand tests than Bitdefender does. If you consider PUP detection ESET is a superior contender as well. We considered all of them at one point or another but they were discarded for various reasons. The article is based on the submission we got through the "Submit information about detected Malware" option in all our products, which reports back meta data (infection names, number of infected objects) about all infections found by our products.
  5. 4 points
    Actually, there is a system behind it: My workstation computers are named after noble gases, like Krypton or Helium. Computers that I only use temporarily or belong to guests are named after transition metals like Titanium. Non-computer devices like smartphones are named after non-metals like Oxygen. All systems and VMs that are used for malware testing are named after radioactive elements like Uranium. Needless to say my WLAN and local workgroup is called "Periodic Table". And yes, I spent a significant amount of time coming up with that system and I am proud of it .
  6. 3 points
    It means that the tests done by AV-C and AV-T have a clear image of how they think AV software should work. The problem arises when your product doesn't fit the mould. Then you get penalized for not doing what everyone else does, even though what everyone else does may not be in the best interest of the user, to begin with. Best example: Snooping around in your encrypted connections, which literally every AV vendor screwed up at least once in the past and probably will continue to happen, exposing users to potentially greater risks than most malware does. For starters, the test sets aren't nearly as representative anymore. When we participated in AV-T and AV-C both tested with less than 200 samples a month on average. 200 samples out of literally tens of millions. The exact selection isn't clear and not representative of what users deal with either. None of them tests with PUPs for example, even though a simple look at any tech support community will tell you, that it is probably by far the biggest problem users are dealing with. So no, neither of those test scores represents real-life performance and it becomes blatantly obvious when you go to places like Bleeping Computer, GeeksToGo, Trojaner Board, Malekal, and all those other communities where people infected by malware show up for help and look at what products these victims used at the time they became infected. Then you will notice that a lot of these products with perfect scores don't look nearly as perfect in real-life conditions. The reason for this discrepancy is quite simple: Most AV vendors will specifically optimise their products for these tests. The most severe cases are where vendors end up outright cheating and detecting the test environments which then results in a change of behaviour of the product (think Dieselgate, but with anti-virus). But there are many ways you can game these tests. For example: you can try to figure out the threat intel feeds the companies use, then just buy those same threat intel feeds so you have all samples in advance you can track their licenses and supply different signatures to them or use your cloud to treat those test systems differently some particularly shady organisations literally also sell you their sample and malicious URL feed, so you can just outright buy the samples and URLs your product will get tested on later What you end up with as a result is a product that is optimised really really well for the exact scenario they are being tested under using the exact type of URLs and samples these testers use, but that is utterly useless when it comes to anything else. We just really don't want to create this type of product. So when we were asked whether we wanted to continue to participate this year, we discussed the matter internally, looked at what we get out of these tests (meaning: whether these tests have a discernable impact on our revenue) and decided that they are simply not worth it and that the tens of thousands of Euros we spent on them every year would be better spent on extending our team and building new ways of keeping our customers safe.
  7. 3 points
    Please note that Emsisoft Anti-Malware for Windows XP hasn't been updated (as in program updates) in over 2 years, and we never intended on continuing long-term database update support for it. In fact, we discontinued our own database updates for it over a year and a half ago, and those still running Emsisoft Anti-Malware on Windows XP have only been receiving BitDefender database updates. We've decided that it is time to stop redistributing those BitDefender updates for Windows XP, as all they are doing is giving those on Windows XP a false sense of security. In addition, it is extremely dangerous to continue using Windows XP. It has (for several years now) had well-known and major security vulnerabilities that Microsoft will never fix. These vulnerabilities make it trivial to infect a Windows XP system, and there is no security software in the world that is capable of preventing it. We can not, in good conscience, continue to provide any support for this version of Windows, as we announced on December 31st, 2015: https://blog.emsisoft.com/2015/12/02/why-we-believe-its-not-ethical-to-sell-antivirus-software-for-windows-xp-any-longer/ We highly recommend that you upgrade to a newer Operating System that is still supported. It doesn't matter if that's a newer version of Windows, or something free like Linux or BSD, as long as you'll be receiving security updates from whoever makes it. New vulnerabilities are discovered almost every day for every major Operating System (Windows, Linux, BSD, MacOS, Android, etc) so it is absolutely critical that you are able to receive security updates from whoever made the Operating System to help keep you and your data safe.
  8. 3 points
    Wenn alle Features eingebaut würden, die Galaxy wünscht, dann würde ich EAM sofort deinstallieren. Ich mag das Programm so wie es ist und hoffe, das bleibt auch so.
  9. 3 points
    Is this working OK now for everyone else? If it is, then there's no need for any more logs. All we needed was a traceroute to send to our CDN provider to help in identifying the server that was having the issue, and I managed to get one of those the other day.
  10. 3 points
    @achtsam Es wird eher langsam Zeit, dass Du deinen privaten Kreuzzug einstellst. Das nimmt ja wirklich paranoide Züge an.
  11. 3 points
    Hello, a2guard.exe is the visible protection process (to put it simple, the Emsisoft icon you see in the system tray). However actual protection drivers start a lot earlier. For example epp.sys (the Emsisoft Protection Platform driver) starts very early in the Windows boot process in order to ensure a protected system even when no user is logged in yet and no other programs have been started.
  12. 3 points
    For the following ransomware, we have decrypters: Actively spreading ransomware: MRCR or Merry X-Mas Globe Globe 2 Globe 3 Nemucod Philadelphia Stampado Xorist Actively spreading ransomware, but the decrypter only works for older infections: Al-Namrood NMoreira LeChiffre PClock FenixLocker GlobeImposter Inactive ransomware: 777 Apocalypse ApocalypseVM AutoLocky BadBlock CrypBoss CryptInfinite CryptoDefense DMALocker DMALocker2 Fabiansomware Harasom HydraCrypt Gomasom KeyBTC Marlboro OpenToYou OzozaLocker Radamant
  13. 3 points
    Today, we've received information that our Dutch team member Rob R. passed away yesterday afternoon, after suffering from an unexpected heart attack last Wednesday. Rob was our lead software tester and we always admired him for his special eye to track down the most tricky bugs. He joined our team more than five years ago by voluntarily sending over a brand new and complete Dutch translation of our software. Shortly after he initiated our efforts in offering physical delivery of our software on CD boxes and USB sticks. He also demonstrated a great interest in testing security software which recently led him to becoming our lead tester for Emsisoft Anti-Malware and Emsisoft Internet Security. Rob will truly live on in our memories as a valued team member and friend.
  14. 3 points
    Hardik587 You are indeed becoming most wearisome. There is an old expression among diehard Texans. "No matter how much you kick a dead horse it won't get up" This is exactly what you are doing.
  15. 3 points
    Hello, please send me your license key via PM (personal message). I will add some days to your key as a sign of goodwill.
  16. 2 points
    I've forwarded your ID and MAC addresses to the creator of STOPDecrypter so that he can archive them in case he is able to figure out your decryption key at some point in the future. All you have to do now is give us some time, and we'll do what we can for you.
  17. 2 points
    Hi Marshall. Not sure, but I do know that I recognize the URL of "MVPS Hosts" and I recognize the list. I don't recognize the list attached to MVPS Hosts (Domains). To view the list, click the blue "Details", "View" & "Original" buttons - see image. Sorry I couldn't offer a better explanation.
  18. 2 points
    > Thanks how do I turn off the notification please ? See: Settings - Notifications - Browser Security verifications
  19. 2 points
    Hello, This is legitimate. You can read more about it here: https://blog.emsisoft.com/en/32517/new-in-2018-12-safe-web-browsing-with-emsisoft-browser-security/
  20. 2 points
    https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/google/google-will-block-third-party-software-from-injecting-code-into-chrome/ Our Surf Protection works by filtering DNS requests made by running applications. Since EAM doesn't use network filter drivers, it has to achieve this using code injection. Now that Chromium is blocking code injection by third-party applications, our Surf Protection will not work with it until we are able to make some changes. My recommendation is to install uBlock Origin and uBlock Origin Extra (both work in Google Chrome and Vivaldi) to supplement until we can get our Surf Protection working in Chrome again. uBlock Origin is a free content blocker that not only blocks ads, but also used the extensive blacklists of malicious domains available from Malware Domain List and Malware Domains to block malicious content. Note: Vivaldi 1.15 (the current stable version) is based on Chromium 65 with backported security fixes from Chromium 66, 67, and 68. Vivaldi 2.0 is based on Chromium 69, and is currently available in testing builds. Anyone with the stable version of Vivaldi installed will not be effected by this issue. Anyone using a Vivaldi 2.0 snapshot will also experience this issue with Surf Protection. Also note: Due to the added protection of an ad blocker, we recommend uBlock Origin (with uBlock Origin Extra for Chromium based browsers like Google Chrome, Vivaldi, and Opera) regardless of whether or not our Surf Protection is working with your web browser. Anti-Virus/Anti-Malware does not block ads by default (doing so can break some websites), and the companies that sell online advertising do not do a good enough job of preventing their ads from being abused by their clients, and there have been many cases of serious threats in advertisements even on legitimate websites. Please be aware that there is another content blocker called "uBlock". This is not the same thing as uBlock Origin, and is not recommended. The main reason for recommending uBlock Origin is due to its performance and memory usage being better than popular ad blockers (AdBlock, Adblock Plus, AdGuard, etc). If you wish to use one of those instead, then please feel free to do so, however I do not know if they are configured to use Malware Domain List and Malware Domains by default and recommend checking their configuration to ensure they are offering the same level of protection as uBlock Origin. If they are not configured to use these lists of malicious websites, then you should be able to add them through FilterLists.com. Note that this site was down at the time I posted this, so I was not able to check and verify that, however this site lists almost every popular filter list for ad and content blockers and it should include important blacklists like these.
  21. 2 points
    Are there any plans of introducing an anti-malware for Mac in the near future? I'm very curious. We see more and more interest of our customers that are demanding a good mac protection software. Now we deliver Emsisoft for Windows but we can't for MAC OS. By canceling development of EIS is there now more of a possibility for a new product?
  22. 2 points
    We had to turn off XP updates because the latest scan engine and its signatures are no longer compatible with it. Instead of pretending that we could protect you from malware (which we effectively can't because XP is full of holes and flaws that aren't gonna be fixed at all) we would rather strongly recommend you to upgrade your computer. If that is for any reason impossible and means that you can't use our software anymore at all, we're happy to issue a refund for the remaining period.
  23. 2 points
    Guten Tag, Bei Schwachstellen in einer Software ist es eigentlich immer am Besten wenn der Softwarehersteller die Schwachstelle behebt. Er ist der einzige, der Zugriff auf den Quellcode hat und diesen direkt verändern kann. Selbst der Patch von Microsoft ist ein wenig eine Krücke in diesem Sinne, da er nur den Zugriff verhindert und nicht wirklich die Schwachstelle behebt. Intel hat jedoch angekündigt innerhalb einer Woche eine Patch zu veröffentlichen und spätestens bis Ende Januar für alle zur Verfügung zu stellen. Emsisoft kann hier nicht dasselbe leiste wie Microsoft oder Intel, da wir weder den Quellcode von Windows noch für die Intelprozessoren haben. Wir werden jedoch, wie immer, unsere Verhaltensanalyse und den Dateiwächter mit allen Signaturen ausrüsten um Malware die diese Schwachstelle nutzen will zu blockieren. Besser ist es jedoch so schnell wie möglich sämtliche Sicherheitsupdates zu installieren. Ein Antivirenprogramm ist keine Alternative zu Sicherheitupdates. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Kathrin
  24. 2 points
    From (very) humble beginnings in a Windows XP Service Pack update, the Windows Firewall has evolved into a capable security tool. Today, its performance is on par with – if not better than – any modern third-party desktop firewall on the market. In light of this, and after a lot of careful consideration, the Emsisoft team made a very conscious decision to rely on the Windows Firewall moving forward, which ultimately led to us merging Emsisoft Internet Security with Emsisoft Anti-Malware. This will allow us to concentrate our efforts on building a bulletproof product while using our Behavior Blocker technology to further strengthen the already rock-solid Windows Firewall. To put it simply, using Windows Firewall in conjunction with Emsisoft Anti-Malware will provide better protection for our users, and that is our number one objective above all else. Since our announcement of the Emsisoft Internet Security and Emsisoft Anti-Malware merger, we have received a lot of positive feedback. However, we also got a lot of questions. We want to take the time to answer the most frequently asked questions in a bit more detail: So are you going to remove the firewall completely? The answer to that question is not as simple as it may seem at first. Firewalls are usually divided into two parts: A so-called packet filter, which usually deals with incoming packets and is therefore often called an inbound firewall; and an application filter that deals with applications wanting to access the network or internet, which is why it is often also referred to as an outbound firewall. Emsisoft Anti-Malware has always had an application filter as part of its Behavior Blocker and that will continue to be true. The difference between the outbound firewall in Emsisoft Anti-Malware and Emsisoft Internet Security is that the former makes decisions autonomously, while the later, at least in theory, allowed you to also use your manual rules. In practice, the default for Emsisoft Internet Security was to automatically allow all outbound connections and the majority of all our users never changed it. Why did you make the change? Was Emsisoft Internet Security less secure than the Windows Firewall? No. All firewalls on modern versions of Windows are based on the same technologies provided by Microsoft. In addition, inbound firewalls in particular are incredibly straightforward to implement, as they only block or allow access based on simple rules. That is why there is absolutely no difference in protection provided between any of the inbound firewalls on the market, including the Windows Firewall. However, the Windows Firewall does have some benefits: Support for Windows Networking like Home Groups is a lot better in the Windows Firewall out of the box. There is no need to tweak any rules manually as was often the case for Emsisoft Internet Security. It is easier to use. This is mostly because third-party applications will take care of creating all necessary firewall rules for you. That is not an option that Emsisoft Internet Security could provide, as most software vendors don’t care about third-party firewalls. The Windows Firewall also provides much better compatibility. Third-party software vendors usually test their products with the Windows Firewall as it is part of Windows, but almost never test their product’s compatibility with aftermarket firewall products. Last but not least, the Windows Firewall also provides a lot more configuration possibilities to expert users and allows for much more complex rulesets than the inbound firewall offered as part of Emsisoft Internet Security. But there are also a couple of disadvantages, which is where Emsisoft Anti-Malware 2017.8 comes in: Intelligent outbound firewall: The outbound firewall part of the Windows Firewall will by default allow every application to connect. This behaviour is actually identical with Emsisoft Internet Security, which also allowed any application to connect to the network or the internet unhindered by default. While both products can be manually configured to block programs from accessing the internet, most users don’t want to deal with this responsibility. This is where the intelligent outbound firewall that is part of our Behavior Blocker comes in, which will prevent malicious applications from communicating with the internet automatically while not getting in the way of benign applications. Enhanced malware protection: The Windows Firewall on its own does not provide any protection against more sophisticated attempts to bypass its outbound firewall through advanced techniques like code injection. Code injection essentially allows malware to take over a trusted program in order for its internet communication to pass through the firewall unhindered. Again, the Behavior Blocker in Emsisoft Anti-Malware is incredibly good at detecting and preventing these kinds of attacks. Windows Firewall Fortification: The functions Windows Firewall provides to software vendors to automatically create rules for their applications in the Windows Firewall for ease of use are also pretty much unprotected. That means that malware can and does create rules for itself automatically. In version 2017.8, we extended our Behavior Blocker technology to protect the exposed Windows Firewall functions from malicious usage. This gives you control over which of your applications are allowed to create Windows Firewall rules for you and which aren’t. This is what we refer to as “Windows Firewall Fortification”. To sum things up, for inbound filtering, the Windows Firewall is just as solid a choice as any other firewall product on the market, including Emsisoft Internet Security. It provides better compatibility and is easier to use for the majority of users. Its drawbacks mostly revolve around its outbound filtering capabilities, which are perfectly complemented by the enhanced Behavior Blocker that is part of Emsisoft Anti-Malware 2017.8 and later. Where can I find the new Windows Firewall Fortification options? The new options are part of the Emsisoft Anti-Malware Behavior Blocker. As such, you can find them under Protection/Application Rules: In addition, whenever the Behavior Blocker sees any application it doesn’t know to be trustworthy attempting to create new firewall rules or change the firewall status, it will attempt to auto-resolve the situation by blocking the attempt: If you have auto-resolve disabled, it will simply ask. Where can I find the “advanced configuration possibilities” you talk about? My Windows Firewall only has a couple of options! The default dialog to configure the Windows Firewall can be incredibly deceptive at first. The advanced configuration dialog is stashed away behind an innocuous looking link in the normal Windows Firewall configuration dialog: Windows Firewall dialog with link to Advanced settings Clicking that link will expose the real configuration of the Windows Firewall where you have full access to all the rules it adheres by. That looks awfully complicated. Are there easier methods? There exist a slew of additional applications that sit on top of the Windows Firewall and attempt to enhance it by making rule creation and management easier. Some of the most popular are: TinyWall (Free) – http://tinywall.pados.hu/ Windows Firewall Control (Freemium) – https://www.binisoft.org/wfc.php Glasswire (Paid) – https://www.glasswire.com/ That being said, we think that the majority of users probably won’t find these tools to be necessary. That is also why we decided against creating our own Windows Firewall front-end and focus our development efforts on improving the complementary and enhanced technology in our Behavior Blocker instead. So what do you recommend I should do? We strongly believe that the combination of Emsisoft Anti-Malware and the Windows Firewall is the best option for almost every user. For the past 12 years while developing our product, we used this exact combination in all of our internal performance evaluations of our technology. Our malware research team works hard to make sure that even the most advanced threats are blocked immediately across all our products. So yes, Emsisoft Anti-Malware blocks the same malware that Emsisoft Internet Security blocks out of the box – no configuration, paying extra or jumping through hoops needed. If you do feel the need to make sure that certain legitimate applications can’t access the internet, the Windows Firewall does offer the ability to do so via its Advanced Settings. If you find that method to be too inconvenient, going with one of the many front-ends may be an option for you. We do know that a small minority of Emsisoft Internet Security users believe that the Windows Firewall must have backdoors implemented by Microsoft to allow them to spy on their users. In all our research, we haven’t found one and neither have hundreds of other security professionals that constantly review Windows for possible backdoors and vulnerabilities. We also think it is important to keep in mind that every single firewall product for Windows Vista and later uses the very same frameworks to implement packet and application filtering. There is no difference between the Windows Firewall, Emsisoft Internet Security and any other third party firewall from a technical point of view. If Microsoft were to backdoor their products to allow unhindered communication, this backdoor would probably be part of the Windows Filter Platform or the NDIS Lightweight Filter Framework, which are the underlying technologies all firewall products are built upon, and affect every firewall product equally. If you still prefer to use a firewall product other than the Windows Firewall, we recommend you contact the software company creating your new firewall product of choice beforehand to ask them whether they implement their own firewall or rely on the Windows Firewall as well. Most firewalls and internet security suites dropped their own implementation in favour of the Windows Firewall many years ago. So we suggest you ask them first to make sure you don’t end up with a Windows Firewall front-end instead. Do you have more questions? Post them in the comments and we’ll answer them. Have an excellent (malware-free) day! View the full article
  25. 2 points
    You don't need an account on the website; you just copy & paste the licence code into the application. Keep the details in case you need them again.
  26. 2 points
    Ah, I see everyone already saw the stable build. You're welcome.
  27. 2 points
    Hello, When it comes to surfing: keep it simple, a browser is only as safe as it's user. I'd advice against using any browser "security" that intercepts https traffic, for an explanation see here: http://blog.emsisoft.com/2017/02/09/https-interception-what-emsisoft-customers-need-to-know/ Choose the browser that suits you best en practice safe surfing (use an adblocker, use a password manager as alternative to using easy to guess or identical passwords), don't visit shady sites and if you're not sure about a site, scan the URL on http://www.virustotal.com Personally I use Google Chrome with uBlock origin, Lastpass, and a few small add-ons that help facilitate certain routine tasks. never had any browser-related security issues.
  28. 2 points
    Both products are based on the same code, but server operating systems require a different (more expensive) license key.
  29. 2 points
    For reinstallation media, always use the Media Creation tool to ensure as much updates as possible are included (this is generally a good idea because it also reduces the amount of updates you'll have to install after installation): https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/software-download/windows10 As for the rest, the vulnerability is/was in the SMB (server message block) protocol, which is not something an average home user requires, if you are concerned you can just reinstall Windows without network connection, go to Programs and Features > Turn Windows Features On and Off and in the populated list locate SMB1, uninstall this before continuing.
  30. 2 points
    The secure connection (HTTPS vs HTTP) has nothing to do with whether or not the website is secure. It has to do with whether or not your connection to the website is secure, which is intended to prevent snooping on communication between you and the server more than it is anything else. Man-in-the-middle attacks can still expose the contents of secure connections, but if a website is configured correctly then it is extremely difficult to do that. A hacker can compromise a website and replace legitimate downloads with infected copies, and this has happened before (ClassicShell and AmmyAdmin are a couple of examples). With popular software (7-Zip for instance) there shouldn't be a BB alert, since it would be trusted by our Anti-Malware Network. With less popular software, it does become more problematic, however a user can search for the SHA-1 hash provided in the alert and try to find information about the file in question.
  31. 2 points
    Fabian who works on the decrypters has been ill recently, but we are looking into this. Please be patient. Regards, Sarah
  32. 2 points
    Hi CBMan, Thank you for your suggestion. As the idea seems fair to me, I added your suggestion in our tracker. Will be discussed soon and then we will decide if discard or work on it. Thanks again, Orlando
  33. 2 points
    Yes, this is normal. It's possible that there may be something we can do to prevent the extra notification, so I'll talk to our QA team and see what they think about this.
  34. 2 points
    We have made a workaround for the above mentioned incompatibility. If you are experiencing the above behavior, please try the following build (no need to uninstall first). HitmanPro.Alert 3.1.7 Build 357 PreRelease Changelog Fixed incompatibility with Emsisoft Internet Security 11.0.0.6131Download http://test.hitmanpro.com/hmpalert3b357.exe Please let me know if this update fixes the incompatibility.
  35. 2 points
    Generell basiert der Mechanismus des Quarantaene Rescans darauf, dass wir Elemente in der Quarantaene nach jedem Update neu scannen. Sollte eine Datei dann ploetzlich nicht laenger erkannt sein, gehen wir davon aus, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelte. Wir justieren Erkennungen konstant. Entsprechend kann es vorkommen, dass insbesondere bei Erkennungen, die von generischen Signaturen ausgeloest wurden, selbst kleine Modifikationen dazu fuehren, dass ein bestimmtes Sample einer Malware Familie nicht laenger erkannt wird. Falls man generell nicht moechte, dass EAM oder EIS die Quarantaene bei jedem Update neu scanned, dann kann man unter Einstellungen/Allgemein den Quarantaene-Scan von "Automatisch" auf "Kein erneutes Scannen" aendern. Haette sie definitiv. Tesla ist im Grunde nicht wirklich neu. Die ersten Versionen gehen auf Mai diesen Jahres zurueck. Das hier wuerde passieren, wenn man versucht TeslaCrypt auf einem von EAM or EIS geschuetzten PC auszufuehren: Sollte man die Cloud Unterstuetzung deaktiviert haben oder in dem unwahrscheinlichen Falle, dass die Cloud das Sample noch nicht kennt, dann bekommt man folgende Warnungen zu sehen: Erst nachdem man jede dieser Warnhinweise ignoriert und die weitere Ausfuehrung erlaubt hat, wird ueberhaupt irgendeine Datei auf dem PC verschluesselt.
  36. 2 points
    I would only recommend one Sandboxing program, Sandboxie. I have used it for years, and it works fine with Emsisoft products. When you install it, Sandboxie will detect the presence of Emsisoft products and ask you if you want to enable compatibility settings. You would want to do this. Any questions, feel free to ask. Pete
  37. 2 points
    Isabelle, I am going to have you run 2 tools that target Adware and Junkware in general. Download AdwCleaner and save it on your desktop. Close all open programs and Internet browsers (you may want to print our or write down these instructions first). Double click on adwcleaner.exe to run the tool. Click on the Scan button. After the scan has finished, click on the Clean button. Confirm each time with OK. You will be prompted to restart your computer. A text file will open in Notepad after the restart (this is the log of what was removed), which you can save on your desktop. Attach that log file to your reply by clicking the More Reply Options button to the lower-right of where you type in your reply. NOTE: If you lose that log file for any reason, you can find it at C:\AdwCleaner on your computer. Download Junkware Removal Tool and save it on your desktop.Run the tool by double-clicking it. The tool will open and start scanning your system. Please be patient as this can take a while to complete depending on your system's specifications. On completion, a log is saved to your desktop and will automatically open. Attach the JRT log file to a reply by clicking the More Reply Options button to the lower-right of where you type in your reply.
  38. 2 points
    I know, that is why I only counted signature updates. Whenever you see an exact signature count in the change log above, one of our signatures was updated. Sorry, what you ask is impossible. It should be obvious to anyone, that if you have a scan engine that already detects 95% of all malware out there, that the other engine can't suddenly detect more than that without causing gross redundancy. In general we can choose to waste hundreds of megabytes of RAM on hundreds of thousands of systems to keep duplicate signatures around so you feel validated in your purchase, or we can choose not to do that, not to waste everyone's resources. To be honest, that's not even a choice really.
  39. 2 points
  40. 2 points
    A summary of the improvements in version 11 can be found in our blog as usual: http://blog.emsisoft.com/2015/10/24/a-sneak-peek-on-emsisofts-version-11-series/ Keep in mind that it is currently only available via the Beta updates option.
  41. 2 points
    Good morning. Can we expect to get a fix for the updates not working soon, please? Having to disable the firewall to get updates seems an important bug to me. Thanks in advance and best regards, François
  42. 2 points
    Similar issue here. I had strayed and had been using a trial of another product. Reinstalled the latest EMIS very early this AM - 3AM EST. Tonight I have been unable to download the 1 new Important Windows Update for 8.1. Have tried several times. Can see that there is zero incoming traffic. Finally get an error that Windows Update failed. I suppose it is possible that the issue is on the Microsoft side.
  43. 2 points
    Looks like my system is still the fastest: Emsisoft Internet Security - Version 10.0 Last update: 4/12/2015 12:05:17 AM User account: Krypton\Fabian Scan settings: Scan type: Malware Scan Objects: Rootkits, Memory, Traces, Files Detect PUPs: On Scan archives: Off ADS Scan: On File extension filter: Off Advanced caching: Off Direct disk access: Off Scan start: 4/12/2015 12:06:09 AM C:\Users\Fabian\AppData\Roaming\tmpUQC0.exe detected: Trojan.MSIL.Inject (A) Scanned 74807 Found 1 Scan end: 4/12/2015 12:06:27 AM Scan time: 0:00:18 This is the first scan after a cold boot. Later scans go down to 11 seconds .
  44. 2 points
    As long as you restart the guard process after it crashed, it shouldn't make a difference.
  45. 2 points
    Bitte das alles deinstallieren. Vor allem LPT, dann geht auch das Internet wieder. Downloade Dir bitte AdwCleaner auf deinen Desktop. Starte die adwcleaner.exe mit einem Doppelklick. Klicke auf Suche, dann Löschen. Nach Ende des Suchlaufs öffnet sich eine Textdatei. Poste mir den Inhalt mit deiner nächsten Antwort. Die Logdatei findest du auch unter C:\AdwCleaner[s1].txt. Zum Schluss bitte einen frischen Scan mit FRST machen und das Logfile anhängen.
  46. 2 points
    It appears you are mixing up Malwarebytes Anti-Malware (current version is 2.0.2.1012) and Emsisoft Anti-Malware (current version is 9.0.0.4142). Since Malwarebytes and Emsisoft are entirely different companies, the license keys aren't interchangeable. However, if you want I can send you a free 1 year license of our product .
  47. 2 points
    Yes, the setup files support a commandline parameter to change installation directory: /DIR="x:\dirname"
  48. 2 points
    Nee, alles in Ordnung Downloade dir bitte Combofix vom folgenden Downloadspiegel Link 1 WICHTIG - Speichere Combofix auf deinem Desktop Deaktiviere bitte all deine Anti Viren sowie Anti Malware/Spyware Scanner. Diese können Combofix bei der Arbeit stören.Starte die Combofix.exe und folge den Anweisungen auf dem Bildschirm. Wenn Combofix fertig ist, wird es eine Logfile erstellen. Bitte poste die C:\Combofix.txt in deiner nächsten Antwort. Hinweis: Solltest du nach dem Neustart folgende Fehlermeldung erhalten starte den Rechner einfach neu. Dies sollte das Problem beheben.
  49. 2 points
    Hello, please take a look in the Registryeditor for the key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VBoxNetFlt and remove it. If you have any more questions or problems, just let me know.
  50. 2 points
    Here are the reports. Also, received error report that C:\$mft is corrupt
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up