Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by andrewek

  1. No, I was referring to the fact that earlier on the site there was only one installation file, without taking into account the system capacity (32 or 64-bit) That is, the file was suitable for any operating system! And now-separate files for 32 and 64-bit. I'm wondering why the division occurred? Many programs have installation files depending on the system capacity. But EAM for a long time was downloaded automatically without regard to bit depth. Or I'm wrong? Probably, it's not so important-just interested in changing the installation file on the site! Maybe there is som
  2. Hi all! Why have now divided the installation files by the bit depth of the operating system and added the combined.exe? After all, there used to be only one file to install the program! What is the reason for this?
  3. Hi Jeremy! Because it used to be an effective way to detect rootkits! But .. GT500 has already explained that today it is not necessary However, all the declared options should work, right? In any case, earlier (in the early versions of the EAM) such a bug was not.I hope that they will fix it!
  4. Hello! I have a similar problem with a Custom Scan The scan does not end and it can not be stopped! Only rebooting the computer ... Is there really a reason-in the option Direct Disc Access?
  5. Hello! I do not quite understand why to create Kit Maker from EAM resources? After all, there is a separate program for the Emergency Kit! What are the advantages? only that the signatures of the EAM system running will be used?
  6. Hello! Perhaps my question will seem naive ... But still: by default, it's worth "checking only files with specific extensions" Yes, their (extensions) can be edited. A long time interested in the question, why exactly? To speed up the scan speed? But then not all files are checked! Is it possible (and does it make sense?) To uncheck and check ALL files?
  7. Hi! Thanks for the answer! I have no problems with access to sites, as well as problems with blocking unreliable! I thought it was a general, global recommendation to turn off AppContainer in Chrome. p.s. Thanks, GT500, but of course I know how to create and edit rules.
  8. Hi! Excuse me, did I understand correctly that you must disable the AppContainer function in the Chrome browser?
  9. Thanks for answers! I understood. Yes, Jeremy, my screenshot was artificially created to show the problem (misleading) Forgive me for having led you astray! But otherwise I could not have time to capture the screen!
  10. Hi Jeremy! Yes, it's written there! For the first time I just did not have time to make a screenshot, and EAM automatically automatically turned on all the protection for no more than three seconds! BUT exactly the same picture at startup, the protection is OFF. You're right, I did this screen (having disabled it myself for 10 minutes) just to show what the interface looks like on startup!
  11. Hello! Thanks for the clarifications! I'm using Windows 7х64 Professional. No, Jeremy, this is a real screen, it's not turning off protection from the context menu, really! I manage to do it when the EAM icon appears in the tray. That's right, with the protection turned off, it appears. But in just 3-4 seconds everything turns on automatically! I believe, is right GT500. I roughly assume that the service and driver are started with Windows, but the interface of the program just lags behind, is delayed. Probably so! And there is no cause for concern. I just wanted
  12. Hello all! Such a message is issued by the EAM at the start of Windows. Rather, I notice that at the start of Windows an EAM icon in the brown color tray. When you open the program interface - there is no protection! It turns on only after a few seconds! That is, EAM is not run with Windows? Or is it just the interface of the program behind? does the GUI process start later? I asked about this in the Russian forum, but I did not get a clear explanation ... https://support.emsisoft.com/topic/27457-eis-запускается-с-выключенной-файловой-защитой/
  13. Hello all! Specifically, I would like to ask about Firefox. As experts believe, is there any need for such settings for some sites? (screen) I understand that the normal operation of some sites will be limited at such permissions. But still? Or do you need to install such permissions unnecessarily, enough - by default?
  14. Yes thank you! I worked for 7 years without these exclusions, apparently they really are not needed! Thanks for the advice!
  15. Hello! Happy New Year! Tell me, please: 1) Is it correct for me to add folders to the exclusions of scanning and monitoring? I thought, will the EAM double-check the quarantine? After all, it's in the Emsisoft folder! Do we need such exclusions (folders Emsisoft) or is it not necessary? 2) Is it more likely that the MBAM folder is moved to exclusions from scanning? ps. I use MBAM only as an on-demand scanner.
  16. 7 years from Emssoft! This is really the best!

  17. Thank you! Happy New Year and Merry Christmas!
  18. Hello! In the blog Emsisoft among 10 New Year's gifts is offered and buying VPN. https://blog.emsisoft.com/2017/12/14/top-10-holiday-tech-gift-ideas/ True, this is NordVPN. I want to ask specialists about the possible problems and shortcomings of the CyberGhost VPN. Its merits and properties are well known. But, perhaps, there are problems and shortcomings? (open port 80, etc.) And how effective is the addition of EAM protection to work with VPN?
  19. Hello! Thanks.I understood correctly - is it normal that the EAM does not report (alert) a change in the program after its update? Specifically, worked Fx 56.02. Updated to Quantum (57.02). Should the EAM at the first start of a new, updated browser inform (alert) that the program has been changed? Now there are no such alerts ... p.s. of course, I know that EAM differs from EIS in the absence of a firewall. The rest is the same!
  20. Hello! Why does Ccleaner find an empty registry key every time I start the system? I understand that this can be added to the exceptions ... But why this key is formed every time again and why is it empty? Can you explain?
  21. Hello! Earlier, when I was working for the EIS, he reported on the launch of any modified (updated) program. For example, after updating any browser-EIS reported on the first start of the updated program- "the program was changed"! I guess it was right! Now EAM does not say anything after updating the programs on the PC. So it should be? Is it done specifically to reduce the number of messages \ warnings?
  • Create New...