andrey

Member
  • Content Count

    972
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by andrey

  1. Hello! Ok, I think that each user must decide for himself whether he needs these pre-installed programs in the system or not.😉 Obviously, there are simply no specific recommendations. Thanks.
  2. Hello All! Last year, the issue of Filelles malware was discussed, and disabling Windows PowerShell was recommended as one of the protection methods. https://blog.emsisoft.com/en/29070/fileless-malware-attacks/ Obviously, PowerShell itself is not dangerous. Dangerous scripts that she can use. And as it is today, when Windows 10 is actively coming and using PowerShell, it is obvious that you will ever have to (I read that it can even replace cmd>) - what should you do today, do you need to disable and / or block PowerShell (for example, through settings Emsisoft Behavioral Blocker)?
  3. Hello! On a computer, HP AdAwareCleaner and Hitman Pro find a large number of pre-installed programs (screen) This is understandable - because the computer is made by HP-Company) But the question is - are these pre-installed programs potentially unwanted, spyware (why)? Because they collect information about the user computer? Do you need these programs on your computer? However, for example, HP Support Assistent checks and offers driver and software updates on your computer! So are these applications needed on a PC?☹️ HitmanPro scan.zip
  4. Hello! That is, you do not recommend AdGuard? Do you think that the included WFP driver will constantly conflict with EAM and AdGuard developers will not be able to solve the compatibility problem? However, the previous version of AdGuard (7.1) works without any problems with the WFP driver turned on. Is it acceptable to work with this version or with a new one, where, possibly, compatibility issues will be fixed? Or is the WFP driver and EAM fundamentally incompatible?
  5. Ah, there you go! So, AdGuard themselves are trying to fix the error and are already testing the beta version with corrections! Thanks for the information! I'll wait for the final release)
  6. Hello all! It's about the AdGuard program. A few days ago, the program was updated to version 7.2. In this version - AdGuardAssistent does not work in any browser! (Edge, IE, Fx, Chrome). This problem is associated (including AdGuard developers) with possible incompatibility with EAM. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardForWindows/issues/2957 Is this really so? They recommend disabling the WFP driver. But then there is no filtering in IE and Edge ... I had to install the previous version, 7.1 and work with it. Everything is in order here! What is the problem? Really in incompatibility? When can I wait for corrections and from which manufacturer? Now Windows 10 Pro x64😉
  7. Yes, just your idea turned out to be absolutely true! I am very grateful to you!
  8. Done! First, I manually installed KB 4490628, and then through Windows Update - KB4512506. Everything worked out Thank you very much, I knew that here on the forum, they will help me with the problem!
  9. Yes, thanks a lot, stapp! I already read about the problem with German-speaking authors...However, I did not quite understand what should be done in my particular case ... KB 4474419 - the update was installed on August 13, the day before yesterday, the day it was released! This update is in the system! But KB 4490628 - NO, and Windows does not find it when looking for updates! Obviously, do I need to download and install KB 4490628 manually?
  10. Hello! Of course, this does not apply directly to Emsisoft products - I apologize. However, maybe you can find a solution? Until that moment, I had no problem installing monthly Windows security updates! But here this Tuesday of patches - KB 4512506 is not installed - unkown error 80092004 .. If in detail - 11% of the file is downloaded - and the download is interrupted with this error! I tried it several times - it repeats that way ... I tried installing using the Offline Installer - not installing either! I want to say that the malware removal tool was installed immediately. And another update for the drivers - also installed. But here is the monthly fix pack (KB 4512506) - he doesn’t want to! What could be the problem? I read on the Internet that many have such a problem! Maybe more experienced users have some suggestions? Windows 7x 64 Pro
  11. Ok, thanks! The problem has already been solved! you need to temporarily enable the Firefox study channel
  12. Hello all! Surely many have already encountered a problem! Almost all Fx extensions (including Emsisoft Browser Security) have stopped working! https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/certificate-issue-causing-add-ons-to-be-disabled-or-fail-to-install/39047 It’s just a temporary one, but a disaster! I wonder how long the developers will correct the error?
  13. Hello all! I have a question about this Firefox extension. Firefox telemetry is disabled in about: config. But this extension is constantly enabled, even if it is disabled via CCleaner (screen). And even if you delete it (delete the xpi file) - the next time you start the browser - this extension works again!😯 How safe is it? can I ignore?
  14. Hello! Does this mean that EAM still has its own rules in web protection? Web protection not transferred completely to the Emsisoft Browser Security extension? I understood everything about the special list hiding, but I wanted to make sure that not only the extension and the rules added by the user now define web protection!
  15. Hello! Thank you very much, that's what I wanted to hear! I got it!
  16. Ok, thanks! So, the next version of EAM already suggests working with this extension! Do I need to install it now or is it more correct to wait for the release of EAM?
  17. Hello all! Tell me, please, is it necessary to use a browser extension if EAM is running in the system? Will there be increased web protection or only unnecessary duplication of EAM web protection? https://malwaretips.com/threads/emsisoft-browser-security.88869/ ( F. Wosar)
  18. Ok, thanks! Yes, about passwords is too much) So, all possible dangers are connected not with the applications themselves, but with advertising modules that can be installed without my knowledge? It is reported that these programs collect information about the IP-address, technical and route information about the computer, search history. But I understand you. Actually, these video downloaders (by themselves) are not dangerous. Of course, obtained from the official site.
  19. Hello! Well-known video downloader SaveFrom.Net Helper installs Tampermonkey, a script manager in your browser. Both of these programs are considered potentially unwanted! It is reported that the extension can (except for silent installation of additional applications) also send user data with possible stealing of passwords, bank data, etc. I want to ask the experts - is this really true?
  20. Hello! You really found the cause-and eliminated it! After one of today's updates, everything is fine! Thank you so much!
  21. Hi! Thank you, I will be grateful!
  22. Hello! The language is not saved in the program settings! This was in version 2018.3, and in the new, 2018.4 - the same situation. I select the RUSSIAN menu from the drop-down menu, but the next time I start the computer (after rebooting), I'm again empty in the window. Although the interface itself - in Russian ... In general, it's little things, but I want the developers to know.
  23. Hello! Thanks to the development team-in the current version (2018.3.1.8572), all the scans work without any problems!
  24. No, I was referring to the fact that earlier on the site there was only one installation file, without taking into account the system capacity (32 or 64-bit) That is, the file was suitable for any operating system! And now-separate files for 32 and 64-bit. I'm wondering why the division occurred? Many programs have installation files depending on the system capacity. But EAM for a long time was downloaded automatically without regard to bit depth. Or I'm wrong? Probably, it's not so important-just interested in changing the installation file on the site! Maybe there is something fundamental in the new versions of the EAM? Now from the Russian site it is offered to download the binary file, from the English-speaking installer msi. Do I need a second option (screen 2) for a 64-bit system or does it not matter?