andrey

Member
  • Content Count

    966
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by andrey

  1. Thank you very much! Today I reinstalled OA and activated the key. (no problem ) Please specify whether I (suddenly need to reinstall! ) once you activate the key within the year!
  2. Hello! Product support roadmap... If I need to reinstall Online Armor - will my valid license key? The validity period-until the summer of 2016. I'm just not sure on the background of the termination of support-will the program my current key?
  3. OK, of course! thank you for your willingness to help!
  4. Ok, I get it still, Christian, I understand the reason for the bluescreen! It can be regarded as a coincidence? bug EAM process?
  5. Hi, Christian! Thanks for the reply! Yes, the version of EAM stable! BSoD happened after updating EAM (screen 2). It was after this update, I turned off the computer and crashed the system! What would you advise to do? reinstall EAM? Now everything works correctly. I did sfc/scannow - Windows does not detect violations of the integrity of the system!
  6. Hello! Sorry-of course, the CRASH! Today I got a BSoD! It happened suddenly, when you shut down the PC. On the next boot - the system is working properly (as if!), but OA offered to send to the address Emsisoft dump-file! The crash of a system is associated with the Emsisoft products?! This is the first time! please tell me-do I need to do something? 050415-13416-01.dmp
  7. Hi all! The product is not dead! long live Online Armor! I'm a fan of this app and he is willing to pay for the Premium version! I hope that Emsisoft will hear our voices and will not leave without attention. I just can't imagine my computer without Online Armor! It is really 100% control of the system. Can't be that such a program was abandoned...
  8. Ah, that's how! To create a rule for \system32 and it will work also for \SysNative? Well, I will!
  9. Yes, I will wait for a response-because EAM periodically gives me trouble, determining SysNative instead of the System32
  10. Of course, I've already done it! In addition, 't find anything suspicious MBAM & Hitman Pro a2scan_141206-130015.txt
  11. Thank you, I understood You! So I want to learn from the experts Emsisoft - how to be in this situation! I already asked on the Russian forum - but.. http://support.emsisoft.com/topic/16209-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%83-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9-%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80-%D0%B5%D0%B0%D0%BC-%D0%BD%D0%B5-%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%80/
  12. Thank you! But... you suggest me to rename this name in the Windows system directory? I would not like to do! And.. why EAM responds to the virtual directory, but not on the real path?!
  13. Hello! EAM (behaviour blocker) responds to the file CMMON32.exe (finds DIALER). The problem is that I had this file is located in Windows\System32\* However, EAM defines this path another Windows\Sysnative\* Therefore, created me a resolution rule for CMMON32.exe - not saved! The rule is created, but after restarting the computer - disappears. It is clear-as I have in the system-there is no such way! (the last screen) How to be in this situation? The disadvantage is that you have each time to re-create the rule permissions for this file!
  14. Thanks for the quick reply! Oh! I didn't know that this question has already been discussed, sorry. No, I will wait for release a stable version , because this bug does not play a significant role..
  15. Hello! EAM does auto-update, it is successful (it is reported by a pop-up window). However, if you hover the mouse pointer over the tray icon-the time of the last successful update does not coincide with the recent. In the reports about the update - that's right. To the time of the last successful update was changed to really just happened-it is necessary to open the EAM interface.. Is as it should be or is it a bug?
  16. Hi! No clear instructions I can't see! However, found the article, where there's a need to delete. But remove OpenH264 Video Codec Ads. It Ads! http://www.trojanremovalhelp.com/openh264-video-codec-ads-cant-deleteremove-openh264-video-codec-ads-manually-and-quickly/ Perhaps the problem is not in the very H264, but in advertising? Of course, there offer to download Spy Hunter... I never will. I thought that there are no hazards in the work of the plugin itself? Whether it is because there is a Flash Player from Adobe. Perhaps my suspicions are unfounded and baseless!
  17. Hello! In recent versions of Fx appeared this plug-in from Cisco Inc. On the Internet I see the message that this is a potential security risk! Is it really safe to play content via OpenH264? But, at the same time the plugin is consistent with the Fx browser.. The plugin I disabled (including through about:config) Interestingly, say experts Emsisoft?
  18. Hi Fabian! Thanks for the detailed answers! Of course, Ad Muncher this is a trusted program.
  19. Do you think that any trusted program (as an example-Ad Muncher ) cannot perform malicious actions? I would like to believe it ...
  20. Fabian, You say In theory it can. But it doesn't. But why it's doesn't?
  21. Thank You Fabian. Your answer is perfectly clear! I was just more than two years working with Ad Muncher and convinced of the effectiveness of the program (even more than AdBlock). However, before it was a commercial program and its behavior was different! For example, the EAM did not find any suspicious activity, but now in the Free version EAM already when you first run Ad Muncher found three potentially unwanted action: code injector; the probability of a possible spy equipment ; and the probability of possible Trojan to download files from the Internet. That is, the actions of Ad Muncher Free are similar to the steps of the browser (e.g., Fx) Of course, I am all of these actions were allowed. But exactly that was the reason to ask on the forum!
  22. Hi! Thank You, Fabian! You speak as proxy in my system. But is it not dangerous from a security standpoint to keep such a proxy? It is known that the risk of privacy! My data may be read by this program. And most importantly passwords can also be read! Right? Of course, Ad Muncher known and has been working for 15 years and is a trusted application.. However? Actually, I have 2 questions: 1) Can Ad muncher (as proxy) to read and send my data (e.g. visited sites and passwords)? 2) Do you need a blocker advertising? I understand that you are not discussing on the forum, third-party products , but I am interested in your opinion about this situation from the point of view of the General security.. I'm curious-what I think and others!
  23. p.s. Online Armor is automatically created rules for Ad Muncher as a trusted program! Of course, my question is not related with the problem with Online Armor. This is more a General question for security! I do not clear properly is an active Internet connection Ad Muncher! My knowledge is not enough...
  24. Hello! Somewhat embarrassed by the behavior of the new version of Ad muncher! When working on the Internet - OA allows outgoing, and then the number of inbound TCP connections from Ad Muncher. Is this okay? Of course, to provide content filtering, Ad Muncher must have access to the network. But in the previous version of such a large number of compounds was! Of course, you will say-ask the developers of the program But from the point of view of specialists Emsisoft is not suspicious this behavior Ad Muncher? Or that all these connections on localhost is valid?