Wilpower2k3

Member
  • Content Count

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Wilpower2k3

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Interests
    People
    Security Software Programs
    HD Motorcycles
    Jeeps
  1. Personally, I don't know what's going on with oasrv.exe ( Online Armor Service)when it spikes like that. I also see the same thing at times(not often); mostly at bootup or when the OS is doing something different then normal. I mean, for me it's not a worry(at this point). I mean, security software always leaves a footprint to some degree, and at times does its thing, so occasionally, I see a spike in CPU and notice it's usually is oasrv.exe doing its thing. No worries.
  2. I have been using AVAST AV with OA++ for quite some time and have absolutely 'no problems' However, you do need to put each in the others "exclusions" list (Avast in OA exclusions and OA in Avast exclusions both in Settings and the File Shield exclusions). B)
  3. Well I guess I will wait and see if anything improves/changes with the Banking Mode (Learn)function and "rotating DNS" recognition in Version 5 B) I will PM you then.
  4. @ Fabian Thank you. Have you had an opportunity to follow this issue yourself: http://support.emsisoft.com/topic/3311-banking-mode-not-consistantly-working-when-used/ Paying particular attention to post #23 on Regards B)
  5. Thank you Fabian: I appolize if I misunderstood. A refund is indeed very gracious, however I will continue to use OA++ and work with the support team for the duration. I would appreciate a dialogue concerning these "few technical limitations" and the issue of 'rotating DNS' with Banking sites and is OA going to account for (address) this; I believe, for me this is really the center of my issue. B)
  6. TMA86, on 06 March 2011 - 03:11 AM, said: - Automated (and working!!!) banking mode (no user interaction) Banking Mode in my opinion is broken and needs major work. A redesign of it is scheduled for 6.0. The fact that it is broken is I think, well known. However, having "Banking Mode" as an advertised feature and not funtioning (credible), this concerns me greatly; it is one of the main reasons I purchased OA++!!! If true, to wait until version 6 (with no public statement) is totally disappointing, to say the least.
  7. (and working!!!) My sense is, there needs to be a major development(shift) in how Banking Mode functions (DNS Handling)(how sites are remembered in "Banking Mode"). I have been communicating with support on the "Banking Mode" problem for over (3)three months witb absolutely no resolution or comment on what the possibilities might be, for the inability of OA++ Bsnking Mode to function(Remenber learned Banking Web sites). So I certainly hope their work on developing and improving "The Banking Mode" for version 5 is the reason there has been No Progress and only intermittent communication(at best), with my on-going support ticket!! My link Attention to posts #23 on. B) In any case, its obvious to me, "Banking Mode" needs major work in order to function correctly and qualify as a credible and effective 'feature'of OA++. And I am excited and confident that the developers are aware of this need and version 5 will adddress this problem.
  8. Seems all good on XP's here. Obviously a reduction in speed on lower RAM machines running both active. B)
  9. I believe that is correct. Here is confirmation of compatability My link
  10. The Sandbox feature in Avast actually runs pograms in a 'virtualized environment' A little different then Run Safer B)
  11. The choice I think is really personal preference. As you can see from my signature, I run both OA++ and Avast 6. I have used both (Sandbox & Run Safer). I don't think one is better then the other. And,I don't think it's necessary to run both. As far as performance is concerned, IMHO that might be an issue with older machines, but the newer ones with dual core and 5GB Ram etc. I wouldn't think there would be any impact on 'performance' Since Avast 6 and the introduction of "Auto-Sandboxing", personally,I don't feel the need to Sandbox or Run Safer all the time (unless the sites are unknown/extreme caution). My personal preference right now is Avast Sandbox, but I restate the choice is going to be individual and I believe both features (Sandbox, Run Safer) succeed at what they were designed to do... Keep your machine safer. B)
  12. I have sent more Firewall logs and Debug "dial" to support a week ago and am waiting for some feedback on the data. NOTE:I have also inquired if any of the DNS discussion here in posts #23 to #33 have any bearing on the problem discussed in this topic. No response as yet. B)
  13. Sounds good. I would love to see OA++ with a "File and Folder Lock" B)
  14. Well what ever the case may be, the fact remains that a feature of the software doesn't function right(at this point). I appreciate the response from Support,and inquiry for Debug Logs and Firewall logs which I provided. Now I'm anticipating a response.
  15. Well I do believe you are on to something. I think catprincess may have eluded to this in an earlier post. Well if there is round -robin, rotating DNS thing going on and being that The Royal Bank is a major finanacial institution; then I would say OA has a serious flaw in its "Banking Mode" feature! Am I wrong??? The Royal Bank can't be the only major bank initiating this kind of round-robin technique. That leaves the question; what can be done to resolve the problem.....And that is what the developers are hopefully going to recognize and resolve. BTW, I don't have a problem accessing 'PayPal' account in "Banking Mode" Edit: I am awaiting a response to the latest data I sent,requested by Support a couple of days ago..