malware1 Posted December 13, 2013 Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 Hello, What's up with the Emsisoft scanner on VirusTotal? It doesn't detect any files even if Emsisoft Anti-Malware blocks them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Peters Posted December 13, 2013 Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 Hello, If the files are blocked by the Emsisoft Anti-Malware File Guard please take a look on the topic http://support.emsisoft.com/topic/13150-bd-signatures/ and the comments from Fabian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malware1 Posted December 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 Here's a new scan of an old sample: Old scan: Emsisoft doesn't detect it according to the new VirusTotal scan. However, it was detected on the old scan. Emsisoft Anti-Malware results: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500 Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Certain Emsisoft scan features (such as PUP detection) are purposefully disabled in the VirusTotal scanner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malware1 Posted December 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I know, but the same happens when I scan malware, not PUP. Emsisoft on VT currently doesn't detect any files as malware. Another example: Old scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/66c6087144338b5b45e1b547677f12ef729ec57c4618008007a57ab9f531fee4/analysis/1385824193/ - detected: Gen:Variant.Kazy.286708 (B) New scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/66c6087144338b5b45e1b547677f12ef729ec57c4618008007a57ab9f531fee4/analysis/1387010655/ - undetected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob R. Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 malware1,You're right. Somethings seems wrong with the detection on VT.We'll check what's wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siketa Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I told you, guys...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob R. Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 It's another example why you shouldn't use VT for comparisons... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spywar Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I hope no one uses it for any kind of test or whatever else ... Since Google bought it, many new engines are being added..........I prefer the old one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrzej76 Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Google has nothing to do with that he bought it, and everyone uses this to what you need, here you can see that there is something wrong with the scanner Emsisoft in the VT, the rest is as it should, you can afford a scan on Jotti and many others, always I knew that VT is not a "guru" and you can not believe him 100% but the other hunters see it differently ..... is they now have a beautiful example .... greet doubters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malware1 Posted December 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2013 Please take a look at this post: http://support.emsisoft.com/topic/13160-possible-fp/#entry94849 Another similar result:old scan:https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/57a244d84989707afa9fd3afd7ea2e3ae840cafef4c890f1ab961e80e25d7d54/analysis/1387475414/latest scan:https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/57a244d84989707afa9fd3afd7ea2e3ae840cafef4c890f1ab961e80e25d7d54/analysis/Something is still wrong with Emsisoft scanner on VirusTotal... I noticed these odd detections few times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts